This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The bill would have aligned the Minnesota self-defense law with the common law, which did not require a retreat when it is possible before the use of force. The controversy highlights rivaling doctrines that we often discuss in Torts. ” There is nothing in the law that would support such a claim.
The Supreme Court ruled that tort law could not be used to overcome First Amendment protections for free speech or the free press. The video claimed without named sources or verifiable evidence that the campaign for Representative Ilhan Omar, a Minnesota Democrat, was collecting ballots illegally (NYSCEF#8 and #9). New York Times.
E&E News reports that similar legislation may soon be introduced in California and Minnesota. Chevron , the Second Circuit held that the City of New York could not sue global fossil fuel producers under state tort law for damages caused by fossil fuel emissions outside of its borders.
The appellate court also agreed with the court below that it was not appropriate to recognize a new tort of “intentional investment in abnormally dangerous activities” advocated by the plaintiffs on behalf of future generations. Minnesota Federal Court Said State Biofuel Mandate Was Not Preempted. United States v. Ruffatto , No.
There is an interesting criminal case out of the Minnesota that highlights both criminal and tort doctrines on the defense of self and defense of property. The case highlights rivaling doctrines that we often discuss in Torts. Minnesota has a Castle Doctrine law. Restatement (Second) of Torts § 218 cmt. Al Rakip J.
The conviction of former Minnesota police officer Kim Potter for manslaughter brought closure for the family of Duante Wright and many in our society. Torts, which I have taught for three decades, often involve wrongful deaths where people are held civilly, not criminally liable.
Marstiller , 20-1263 , presents the question whether the federal Medicaid Act allows state Medicaid programs to recover reimbursement for Medicaid’s payment of a beneficiary’s past medical expenses by taking funds from the beneficiary’s tort recovery that compensate for future medical expenses. Fillmore County, Minnesota , 20-7028.
The court also dismissed defamation and related state tort claims. Minnesota and Washington Courts Said Climate Protesters Could Present Necessity Defense at Trial; Protester Found Guilty of Criminal Mischief and Trespass After North Dakota Court Denied Permission to Present Necessity Defense. Attorney General of Vermont , No.
The court said the laws’ provision for criminal or tort liability for advising, encouraging, or soliciting persons participating in a riot to acts of force or violence was overbroad and vague. Minnesota Supreme Court Declined to Review Claims Regarding Environmental Review for Oil Pipeline. WildEarth Guardians v. 4:13-cv-00151 (D.
Minnesota Court and D.C. The Minnesota Court of Appeals denied motions to stay the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission’s decisions authorizing Enbridge Energy, LP’s Line 3 pipeline replacement project. Minnesota opposed the stay. Minnesota v. In re Acorn Energy Solar 2, LLC , No. 2019-398 (Vt. 20-cv-1636 (D.
On May 24, 2021, the mandate issued for the Second Circuit’s judgment affirming dismissal of New York City’s tort law-based case against fossil fuel companies. Minnesota v. Chevron Corp. City of Oakland , No. 20-1089 (U.S.). City of New York v. Chevron Corp. , 18-2188 (2d Cir. May 24, 2021). The opening brief is due June 16.
Minnesota Court of Appeals Upheld State Approvals for Enbridge Crude Oil Replacement Pipeline. Minnesota v. The MPF brought a tort case against de Rezende for causing the deforestation of 2,488.56 California Coastal Commission , No. D076956 (Cal. June 23, 2021). American Petroleum Institute , No. 21-01752 (8th Cir.).
and Minnesota Federal Courts Remanded Climate Cases Against Fossil Fuel Industry. Two federal district courts—in Minnesota and the District of Columbia—granted motions to remand cases brought by plaintiffs against the fossil fuel industry. Minnesota v. Chevron USA Inc. , 21-15318 (9th Cir. American Petroleum Institute , No.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content