This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
. & Wenliang Zhang (Associate Professor, Renmin University of China Law School). In 2020, Shanghai Yongrun brought an action against Kashi Galaxy and Xu in NewYork state court, seeking to have the Chinese judgment recognized and enforced. In Shanghai Yongrun Investment Management Co. Kashi Galaxy Venture Capital Co. ,
Comparative ProceduralLaw and Justice (CPLJ) is a global project of the Max Planck Institute Luxembourg for ProceduralLaw, with the support of the Luxembourg National Research Fund (O19/13946847), involving more than one hundred scholars from all over the world. 3:00 pm Oscar Chase (NewYork University).
In some examples cited in the paper, a Virginia defendant in Virginia charged with transporting marijuana pleaded guilty to trafficking a different type of drug altogether; a NewYork defendant charged with animal cruelty pleaded guilty to trespassing even though no trespassing was involved.
The application of the NewYork Convention regarding requests to recognize CAS awards is undisputable and common to all Greek decisions. National rules of Civil procedure. 4 Greek Code of Civil Procedure. Main findings. It simply determines the burden of proof and the party borne with it. Field of application of CAS.
The more efficient your firm’s process for onboarding new clients, the quicker you’ll be able to do what your firm was hired—and paid—to do: represent the interests of your clients. While ethical obligations regarding law firm oversight vary from one jurisdiction to the next, one thing is clear: accurate conflict checks are crucial.
The decision also deals with questions of German procedurallaw. According to German procedurallaw, the reception of a waiver of succession is an estate matter. According to the established case law of the Swiss Federal Tribunal, this binding approach does not conflict with the NewYork Convention either.
The following comment is also featured: Rebekka Monico , Research fellow at the University of Insubria, La disciplina europea sul Geo-blocking e il diritto internazionale privato e processuale (The EU Geo-Blocking Regulation and Private International and ProceduralLaw). vii-485.
b) Manifest Disregard of the Law and Agreement – “Redefining” the Term “Received”. The Southern District Of NewYork decided that the Petitioner’s motion to vacate the arbitration panel’s Final Award is denied and Respondent’s cross-motion to confirm the award is granted. Company Distributions. Stage 2: Greece. Conclusion.
In fact, we include such language in the award because in the NewYork Convention, for example, the US has taken a reservation to that treaty that it will enforce the awards based on reciprocity. So it has to be in a NewYork Convention country. The judiciary is supportive of international arbitration.
The case also gave the ECJ reason to address some interesting aspects of international jurisdiction under Article 35 of the Brussels Ibis Regulation and the relationship between this provision and the procedurallaws of the Member States. Thon: Jurisdiction Clauses in General Terms and Conditions and in Case of Assignment.
This is what she wrote: Ann, I’ve been an avid listener of your podcast and attended a Lunch Learn a long time ago when you were based out of NewYork. And the approach is really different because paralegals need to have a knowledge of procedurallaw, a little bit of sustainable law, and they also need to have technical skills.
Ever since 2009, when the German choice-of-law provisions for contracts were removed and the Rome I Regulation with its carve-out for arbitration agreements entered into force, the choice of law for arbitration agreements has been debated in Germany. a NewYork Convention applies already before or during arbitral proceedings.
While efforts to create groundbreaking social services for communities have taken months and years to develop, one thing many can agree on is that there’s no one-size-fits-all approach as every city has different needs, procedures, laws, and money to pay for change, CNN explains. . “Some things you know it’s the right way.
The question is how such laws should be considered when state-law disputes are brought in federal court under diversity of citizenship jurisdiction because the dispute involves citizens of different states. In such cases, the rule is that federal courts apply state substantive law and federal procedurallaw.
“The 2005 Hague Choice of Court and the 2019 Hague Judgments Conventions versus the NewYork Convention – Rivals, Alternatives or Something Else?”, The Value of a New Judgments Convention for U.S. Litigants”, NewYork University Law Review 94 (2019), pp 1210-1243. Coco, Sarah E. Cuniberti, Gilles.
The Kashef case currently before the federal courts in NewYork shows that human rights litigation against corporate defendants in the United States is alive and well. Reimann: Human Rights Litigation Beyond the Alien Tort Claims Act: The Crucial Role of the Act of State Doctrine.
“The 2005 Hague Choice of Court and the 2019 Hague Judgments Conventions versus the NewYork Convention – Rivals, Alternatives or Something Else?”, The Value of a New Judgments Convention for U.S. Litigants”, NewYork University Law Review 94 (2019), pp 1210-1243. Coco, Sarah E. Cong, Junqi. Kasem, Rouzana.
Implementing the Hague Judgments Convention”, NewYork University Law Review 97 (2022), forthcoming (Draft available here ). The 2005 Hague Choice of Court and the 2019 Hague Judgments Conventions versus the NewYork Convention – Rivals, Alternatives or Something Else?”, Cardoso, Connor J. Coco, Sarah E.
“The 2005 Hague Choice of Court and the 2019 Hague Judgments Conventions versus the NewYork Convention – Rivals, Alternatives or Something Else?”, The Value of a New Judgments Convention for U.S. Litigants”, NewYork University Law Review 94 (2019), pp 1210-1243. Coco, Sarah E. Cong, Junqi. Kasem, Rouzana.
“The 2005 Hague Choice of Court and the 2019 Hague Judgments Conventions versus the NewYork Convention – Rivals, Alternatives or Something Else?”, The Value of a New Judgments Convention for U.S. Litigants”, NewYork University Law Review 94 (2019), pp 1210-1243. Coco, Sarah E. Cong, Junqi. Kasem, Rouzana.
“The 2005 Hague Choice of Court and the 2019 Hague Judgments Conventions versus the NewYork Convention – Rivals, Alternatives or Something Else?”, The Value of a New Judgments Convention for U.S. Litigants”, NewYork University Law Review 94 (2019), pp 1210-1243. Coco, Sarah E. Cong, Junqi. Kasem, Rouzana.
Implementing the Hague Judgments Convention”, NewYork University Law Review 97 (2022), forthcoming (Draft available here ). The 2005 Hague Choice of Court and the 2019 Hague Judgments Conventions versus the NewYork Convention – Rivals, Alternatives or Something Else?”, Cardoso, Connor J. Coco, Sarah E.
Implementing the Hague Judgments Convention”, NewYork University Law Review 97 (2022), forthcoming (Draft available here ). The 2005 Hague Choice of Court and the 2019 Hague Judgments Conventions versus the NewYork Convention – Rivals, Alternatives or Something Else?”, Cardoso, Connor J. Coco, Sarah E.
Implementing the Hague Judgments Convention”, NewYork University Law Review 97 (2022), forthcoming (Draft available here ). The 2005 Hague Choice of Court and the 2019 Hague Judgments Conventions versus the NewYork Convention – Rivals, Alternatives or Something Else?”, Cardoso, Connor J. Coco, Sarah E.
Ashley Professor of Law, Co-Director, Center for Transnational Litigation, Arbitration, and Commercial Law, NewYork University School of Law, USA Professor Geneviève Saumier, Peter M. Programme Friday, 9 June 2023 8.30 a.m. Registration 9.00 Silberman, Clarence D.
“, University of Pittsburgh Law Review 82 (2021), pp. 847-880 (available here ) Brannigan, Neil “Resolving conflicts: establishing forum non conveniens in a new Hague jurisdiction convention”, Journal of Private International Law 18 (2022), pp. The Value of a New Judgments Convention for U.S. 187-214 Coco, Sarah E.
“, University of Pittsburgh Law Review 82 (2021), pp. 847-880 (available here ) Brannigan, Neil “Resolving conflicts: establishing forum non conveniens in a new Hague jurisdiction convention”, Journal of Private International Law 18 (2022), pp. The Value of a New Judgments Convention for U.S. 187-214 Coco, Sarah E.
“, University of Pittsburgh Law Review 82 (2021), pp. 847-880 (available here ) Brannigan, Neil “Resolving conflicts: establishing forum non conveniens in a new Hague jurisdiction convention”, Journal of Private International Law 18 (2022), pp. The Value of a New Judgments Convention for U.S. 187-214 Coco, Sarah E.
A NewYork judge set an April 15 start date on Monday for Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s criminal case against former US President Donald Trump. The post NewYork judge sets April 15 start date for Trump in falsified business records case appeared first on JURIST - News.
20) in line with the principles enshrined in the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (VCLT), she presented the public policy exception as part of one important line of development within (see Art. 301 Civil ProcedureLaw (2023). 22 PRC Civil Procedurelaw is limited to the defendant in the original proceedings.
A book review by Rachele Beretta (Ph.D): William URY , Possible: How We Survive (and Thrive) in an Age of Conflict , Harper Business, NewYork, 2024, 1-368. 150/2022 d.lgs. 31/2024) , Giappichelli, Torino, 2024, I-XX, 1-335.
NewYork judge Juan Merchan on Friday ordered Donald Trump to appear for sentencing on January 10 for his hush-money conviction, finding that a president-elect does not enjoy presidential immunity. The post NewYork judge to sentence Trump for hush-money conviction before presidential oath-taking appeared first on JURIST - News.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content