This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The US Supreme Court declined to hear an appeal from NorthCarolina on Monday over the constitutionality of a state law allowing employers to sue employees working as undercover investigators. NorthCarolina’s writ of certiorari focused on three arguments.
California, Michigan, NorthCarolina and Washington, D.C., It is a realistic prediction that we’ll live in a world where thousands of estate planning lawyers work for Fidelity, and hedge funds run the most significant plaintiff tort outfits. have task forces up and running, exploring revisions to Rule 5.4.
A Lloyd's of London syndicate has urged a NorthCarolina judge to toss part of Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft LLP's coverage lawsuit stemming from a data breach, saying there's no tort remedy for the allegation that the insurer exposed the firm's confidential information in a court filing.
United States , the 1950 Supreme Court case holding that the United States is not liable under the Federal Tort Claims Act for injuries sustained by members of the armed forces while on active duty and resulting from the negligence of others in the armed forces. United States. The case involves the so-called Feres doctrine, after Feres v.
’Tis the season for the Christmas tort. Thus, each year we gather for the posting of the annual list of Christmas torts and crimes. This year’s Christmas tree at Rockefeller Center had its own inter-species tort when an owl was found in a tree driven from upstate New York. Last year, for example, Curtis L.
Delaware's Court of Chancery on Friday stayed a NorthCarolina public water authority's suit to void asset transfers in what the authority termed a toxic pollution liability "shell game" by DuPont affiliates and successors, after defense attorneys acknowledged omissions in an opposition brief.
A tragedy in NorthCarolina could present rather difficult torts questions in a wrongful death case for a grieving family. While I am not a NorthCarolina lawyer, the state does not appear ideal for plaintiffs in this type of action and the facts of the case could present other difficulties.
We previously discussed the shooting of Andrew Brown, 42, one of a number of recent police shootings sparking protests. The body camera footage has now been released with a decision not to charge any officer. The finding of a justified shooting is based on facts that are sharply different from those reported at the time in media coverage.
and NorthCarolina Farm Bureau Federation v. A federal district court in NorthCarolina ultimately invalidated much of the law, and the U.S. The Farm Bureau and NorthCarolina Attorney General Josh Stein ask the court to grant review and reverse the 4th Circuit’s decision. ” (relisted after the Sept.
In her initial expert disclosures, plaintiff identified Dr. Steege from Chapel Hill, NorthCarolina. Note: Chapter 49, Section 8 of Day on Torts: Leading Cases in Tennessee Tort Law has been updated to include this decision. Code Ann. § 26-26-115(b). The trial court ruled that “Dr.
I also teach critical race theory, alongside other legal theories to my first-year torts students. Those efforts received a boost recently from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, which rejected the free speech claims of NorthCarolina State University Professor Stephen Porter. The decision in Porter v.
A federal case in NorthCarolina recently resulted in $75 million in damages for two wrongly convicted men but that award was in the federal system. Pennsylvania cases for malicious prosecution are based on the Restatement (Second) of Torts. Cosby would qualify under such a program. The men were sent to death row.
Distinguished Professor at the University of NorthCarolina School of Law, and Mitu Gulati, the Perre Bowen Professor of Law at the University of Virginia School of Law. Written by Mark Weidemaier, the Ralph M. Stockton, Jr.
This week, we highlight cert petitions that ask the court to consider, among other things, PETA’s First Amendment challenge to a NorthCarolina law that imposes monetary damages on undercover workplace recording. The law at issue was enacted in response to a dispute between Food Lion and ABC News in NorthCarolina in the late 1990s.
The court also declined without comment to take up two other petitions , seeking review of a ruling by a federal appeals court that invalidated on First Amendment grounds a NorthCarolina law that allows employers to sue employees who make undercover video or audio recordings. ” (relisted after the Sept. 13 conferences) King v.
Brownback , 22-912 Issue : Whether the Federal Tort Claims Act’s judgment bar, which this court has repeatedly said functions in much the same way as the common-law doctrine of res judicata, nevertheless operates to bar claims brought together in the same action. 6 conferences) NorthCarolina Farm Bureau Federation v.
In celebration of Thanksgiving, I give you our annual Turkey Torts of civil and criminal cases that add liability to libations on this special day (with past cases at the bottom). Indeed, the torts and crimes recorded this year seem painfully reminiscent of this loathsome year. She also threatened another woman with a carving knife.
It makes a (very) little more sense when you check the docket and realize that Passantino is represented by Jesse Binnall, the MAGAworld lawyer hired for pointless windmill tilts on behalf of such luminaries as former NorthCarolina Lt.
The court held that plaintiffs had alleged sufficient conduct in the United States to support their Alien Tort Statute (ATS) claim and that the Tort Victim Protection Act (TVPA) permitted aiding and abetting claims against the corporate executives.
The non-profit has now also filed a petition in a challenge to the University of NorthCarolina that it hopes can serve as a companion to the Harvard case. University of NorthCarolina. NorthCarolina State Health Plan for Teachers & State Employees v. University of NorthCarolina.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content