Legal Research is Easy
AUGUST 5, 2019
In School District of Abington Township, Pennsylvania v. In an 8-1 decision, the Court found that the Pennsylvania law and school-district practice violated the Establishment Clause and the Free Exercise Clause. Of course, this brings us to our word of the month: STARE DECISIS. Schempp , 374 U.S. Schempp , 374 U.S.
Conflict of Laws
JUNE 13, 2024
LLC, Raiders , a Pennsylvania company insured a yacht for up to $550,000 with Great Lakes, a UK-based company. [12] It has anchorage on doctrines such as stare decisis and precedents. Stare decisis and precedents ensure that the law remains strong, stable, reliable, and predictable without standing still.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
SCOTUSBlog
SEPTEMBER 1, 2021
Since the decision of Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Chief Justice John Roberts wrote at length about the importance of stare decisis in voting to strike down a Louisiana abortion restriction last year in June Medical Services v. Wade to the Present.
SCOTUSBlog
APRIL 20, 2022
Although the railroad’s principal place of business is Virginia, it is registered to do business in Pennsylvania as a foreign corporation, and Mallory sued there. However, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court held that state’s consent-by-registration statute to be unconstitutional under the due process clause.
SCOTUSBlog
APRIL 27, 2022
Evidently, the petitioner in Mallory (a railroad worker who wants to sue his employer in Pennsylvania) was successful in arguing that his case is a better vehicle for addressing the issue than Cooper Tire & Rubber Company v. McCall , the other case raising the issue, which the court will now hold pending the outcome of Mallory.
SCOTUSBlog
FEBRUARY 17, 2022
Pennsylvania. Breyer will be remembered for judicial independence while serving on the court, a meticulous approach to analyzing the record and drafting opinions, and a commitment to stare decisis , consistently drawing upon well-established principles. Carhart , Burwell v. Casey and Roe v.
Fordham Law News
JANUARY 5, 2024
13] The Court defended the exemption largely on the grounds of stare decisis and congressional acquiescence, tasking Congress with changing the long-standing law if they felt the need. [14] Kuhn , which saw the Supreme Court acknowledge that baseball was in fact interstate commerce, yet again defend baseball’s exemption. [13]
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
52 
Let's personalize your content