On Fighting Personal Injury Cases in Charleston
LegalReader
NOVEMBER 15, 2021
What you have to know is that in South Carolina, the statute of limitations in personal injury cases is three years from the date of the injury.
Personal Injury South Carolina Statute 
52 
That's gonna hurt
Legal Research is Easy
SEPTEMBER 3, 2020
As it turns out, South Carolina, where Young Lady happened to trip and tear up her knees, has it's own Torts Claim Act called, not surprisingly, the South Carolina Tort Claims Act under § 15-78-10. Which is why (love 'em or hate 'em) people hire lawyers to handle personal injury lawsuits.
Join 99,000+
Insiders
Sign Up for our Newsletter
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Trending Sources
Spooky Torts: The 2021 List of Litigation Horrors
JonathanTurley
OCTOBER 31, 2021
Halloween of course remains a holiday seemingly designed for personal injury lawyers around the world and this year’s additions show why. See Pennsylvania General Assembly Statute §7102. We also have a potential duel case out of Aiken, South Carolina from one year ago. Johnson & Johnson. Charges pending.
Spooky Torts: The 2022 List of Litigation Horrors
JonathanTurley
OCTOBER 30, 2022
Halloween of course remains a holiday seemingly designed for personal injury lawyers around the world and this year’s additions show why. Particularly with the recent tragedy in South Korea, our annual listing is not intended to belittle or ignore the serious losses that can occur on this and other holidays. Charges pending.
Spooky Torts: The 2023 List of Litigation Horrors
JonathanTurley
OCTOBER 30, 2023
Halloween of course remains a holiday seemingly designed for personal injury lawyers around the world and this year’s additions show why. See Pennsylvania General Assembly Statute §7102. South Carolina (2009) Quentin Patrick, 22, an ex-convict in Sumter, South Carolina shot and killed a trick-or-treater T.J.
June 2021 Updates to the Climate Case Charts
ClimateChange-ClimateLaw
JUNE 8, 2021
Supreme Court held that the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals erred when it concluded that its review of the remand order in Baltimore’s climate change case against fossil fuel companies was limited to determining whether the defendants properly removed the case under the federal officer removal statute. May 10, 2021).
Let's personalize your content