Patently O
FEBRUARY 27, 2024
Still, the guidelines spend some time on the requirements of a prima facie case; the necessity of both evidence and reasoning to support any obviousness rejection; and consideration of all evidence before the examiner. Of course, the PHOSITA level is fact dependent and changes according to the area of technology or market.
Patently O
MARCH 29, 2021
On appeal, though, the Federal Circuit found that the USPTO had presented a prima facie case by noting that the invention: “violates the first law of thermodynamics,” is “contrary to traditional understanding of chemistry,” and “violates the classical laws of physics” including conservation of mass. .”
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Patently O
JUNE 1, 2021
To be clear, Hyatt’s applications focus on fundamental aspects of microchip and integrated circuit technology and so could be extremely valuable as enforceable patents. 52(c) judgment against the PTO – finding that it had failed to present a prima facie case of prosecution laches.
Patently O
NOVEMBER 29, 2023
Hamilton Technologies (No. 23-575): This case involves a dispute over the PTAB’s obviousness finding and the Federal Circuit’s affirmation, particularly focusing on the qualifications of an expert witness, the proper interpretation of claim terms, etc. Hamilton Technologies, No. Fortinet (No. Fortinet, No.
At the Lectern
AUGUST 11, 2022
.” The dissent said that the sentencing decision “rested on multiple statements that were improper” and the appellate court “must reverse when, as is the case here, we ‘cannot determine whether the improper factor was determinative for the sentencing court.’ Uber Technologies, Inc. ,
Conflict of Laws
OCTOBER 1, 2024
Interestingly, in 2021, the same bench of the Delhi High Court granted the first-ever anti-enforcement injunction in India in Interdigital Technology Corporation v. The court while endorsing its holding in Interdigital Technology Corporation v. Xiaomi Corporation.
Above The Law
JANUARY 24, 2025
Decision The court concluded that Lewis failed to make a prima facie case for discrimination because her comparators were not “similarly situated in all material respects.” The decision reflects a trend in patent law towards limiting patents on basic or routine technological applications. 4 Jarnutowski v.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
122 
Let's personalize your content