This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Share The court turns to sovereign immunity on Wednesday when it hears argument in Financial Oversight and Management Board for PuertoRico v. The case involves the board Congress created in response to PuertoRico’s dire financial distress in 2016. Centro de Periodismo Investigativo.
On November 22, 2022, sixteen municipalities of PuertoRico filed a lawsuit in the federal district court in PuertoRico seeking to hold coal, oil, and gas companies liable for losses resulting from storms during the 2017 hurricane season and ongoing economic losses since that time. In Municipalities of PuertoRico v.
Share Thursday’s decision in Financial Oversight & Management Board for PuertoRico v. Ignoring the threshold questions on which the court had not granted review and applying a longstanding clear-statement rule, a near-unanimous court ruled in favor of PuertoRico’s financial oversight board.
Issues : (1) Whether courts can defer to the construction of a statute by the Department of Veterans Affairs without first considering whether the statute permits a pro-veteran construction pursuant to the pro-veteran canon; and (2) whether Chevron U.S.A. Financial Oversight and Management Board for PuertoRico v.
Gorsuch drew a comparison between the federally funded and administered CFR courts and the courts of PuertoRico. “If Justice Neil Gorsuch wrote the dissent. Gorsuch, who spent more than 10 years as a judge on the Tenth Circuit, has the most significant background in tribal affairs currently on the Supreme Court.
Financial Oversight and Management Board for PuertoRico v. 223, 228 (1989), a statute does not abrogate sovereign immunity unless Congress’s intent to abrogate is “unmistakably clear” in the statutory text. Centro de Periodismo Investigativo, Inc.: Under Dellmuth v. Muth , 491 U.S.
An additional 12 states, and PuertoRico, affirm that there is no “duty to retreat” if you are threatened in a place where you are lawfully present. The trial judge didn’t bring it up, and no instructions were given to the jury at my trial regarding the relevance of the statute to my case. Frankly I doubt it.
People born in the other territories — Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, PuertoRico, and the U.S. permits courts to defer to the Department of Veterans Affairs’ construction of a statute designed to benefit veterans, without first considering the pro-veteran canon of construction; and (2) whether Chevron should be overruled.
The ULC is a non-partisan, non-profit, unincorporated association comprised of volunteer attorneys appointed by each state of the United States plus the District of Columbia, PuertoRico, and the U.S. On the one hand, they could seek recognition and enforcement under the federal statute. Virgin Islands.
Six months later, a federal court indicted Denezpi for a violation of a federal criminal statute pursuant to the same incident; he was ultimately convicted and sentenced to serve 30 years in prison. Wheeler and, more recently, PuertoRico v. Barrett acknowledged that past cases such as U.S.
Share The Supreme Court on Tuesday probed Congress’ authority to deny welfare benefits to PuertoRico and other U.S. Residents of all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the Northern Mariana Islands can qualify for the program, but residents of PuertoRico and the other territories are excluded. government.
On May 21, the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA) sued CMS on APA grounds, claiming that this change to the best price rule exceeds CMS’s statutory authority and is contrary to the Medicaid Rebate statute. Territories (American Samoa, Northern Mariana Islands, Guam, PuertoRico, and the U.S.
The Court specifically concluded that the rule “rests on two contradictory interpretations of the statute” and “conflict[s] with the regulatory definition.” As of this summer, 20 states and PuertoRico have enacted legislation to restrict the use of copay adjustment programs.
The Lacey Act and other federal wildlife statutes could be charged for such conduct. This was the issue in Woods-Leber v Hyatt Hotels of PuertoRico (1997), Hyatt was found not to be strictly liable for an attack on its grounds by a rabid mongoose on a guest. However, the penalties are notably higher.
Share Wednesday’s argument in Financial Oversight and Management Board for PuertoRico v. The Financial Oversight and Management Board is an entity created under a 2016 federal statute ( PROMESA ) to take control of and restructure the finances of PuertoRico. At bottom, the case is a public-records dispute.
The ACA defines “cost-sharing” to include “deductibles, coinsurance, copayments, or similar charges” and “any other expenditure required of an insured individual…” The statute sets an annual cap on the “expenditure[s] required of an insured individual” by their health insurance plan.
Share Jose Luis Vaello-Madero is an American citizen who was born in PuertoRico. But when he moved back to PuertoRico to be closer to his family, Vaello-Madero lost his SSI benefits because, by law, PuertoRico residents are excluded from the program. The case, United States v. territories.
Villanueva spent a large part of his childhood in PuertoRico and is of part Puerto Rican heritage himself. Specifically, he served in the US Air Force and California Army National Guard between 1983 and 1985 and remained in the military until 1992. ” However, the other reinstated individuals appear to remain employed.
relisted after the Jan. 8 conference). Scarnati v. Pennsylvania Democratic Party , 20-574. relisted after the Jan. 8 conference). Returning Relists. United States , 20-60. relisted after the Dec. 11 and Jan. 8 conferences). The post Blockbuster Watch appeared first on SCOTUSblog.
relisted after the Dec. 15 conferences). California , 220153. relisted after the Jan. 15 conferences). Scarnati v. Pennsylvania Democratic Party , 20-574. relisted after the Jan. 15 conferences). The post Relist Watch appeared first on SCOTUSblog.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content