This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The federal district court for the District of Columbia upheld the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s (NOAA’s) redaction of certain communications between a NOAA climate scientist and the director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) from January 20, 2009, through January 20, 2017.
The 2019 Judgments Convention: The Need for Comprehensive Federal Implementing Legislation and a Look Back at the ALI Proposed Federal Statute”, NYU School of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. , DePaul Law Review 52 (2002), pp 319-349. Silberman, Linda. 21-19 (available here ). Skvortsova, Tatyana Aleksandrovna; Denyak, Victoria Yurievna. “On
The 2019 Judgments Convention: The Need for Comprehensive Federal Implementing Legislation and a Look Back at the ALI Proposed Federal Statute”, NYU School of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. , DePaul Law Review 52 (2002), pp 319-349. Silberman, Linda. 21-19 (available here ). Solomon, Dennis. 88-92 (available here ). Spitz, Lidia.
The 2019 Judgments Convention: The Need for Comprehensive Federal Implementing Legislation and a Look Back at the ALI Proposed Federal Statute”, NYU School of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. , DePaul Law Review 52 (2002), pp 319-349. Silberman, Linda. 21-19 (available here ). Skvortsova, Tatyana Aleksandrovna; Denyak, Victoria Yurievna. “On
The 2019 Judgments Convention: The Need for Comprehensive Federal Implementing Legislation and a Look Back at the ALI Proposed Federal Statute”, NYU School of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. , DePaul Law Review 52 (2002), pp 319-349. Silberman, Linda. 21-19 (available here ). Skvortsova, Tatyana Aleksandrovna; Denyak, Victoria Yurievna. “On
The 2019 Judgments Convention: The Need for Comprehensive Federal Implementing Legislation and a Look Back at the ALI Proposed Federal Statute”, NYU School of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. , DePaul Law Review 52 (2002), pp 319-349. Silberman, Linda. 21-19 (available here ). Skvortsova, Tatyana Aleksandrovna; Denyak, Victoria Yurievna. “On
The 2019 Judgments Convention: The Need for Comprehensive Federal Implementing Legislation and a Look Back at the ALI Proposed Federal Statute”, NYU School of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. , DePaul Law Review 52 (2002), pp 319-349. Silberman, Linda. 21-19 (available here ). Skvortsova, Tatyana Aleksandrovna; Denyak, Victoria Yurievna. “On
The 2019 Judgments Convention: The Need for Comprehensive Federal Implementing Legislation and a Look Back at the ALI Proposed Federal Statute”, NYU School of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. , DePaul Law Review 52 (2002), pp 319-349. Silberman, Linda. 21-19 (available here ). Skvortsova, Tatyana Aleksandrovna; Denyak, Victoria Yurievna. “On
, DePaul Law Review 52 (2002), pp 319-349 Silberman, Linda “The 2019 Judgments Convention: The Need for Comprehensive Federal Implementing Legislation and a Look Back at the ALI Proposed Federal Statute”, NYU School of Law, Public Law Research Paper No.
1442, or the civil-rights removal statute, 28 U.S.C. The district court rejected eight grounds for removal, but the Fourth Circuit concluded its appellate jurisdiction was limited to determining whether the companies properly removed the case under the federal-officer removal statute. Mayor & City Council of Baltimore , No.
, DePaul Law Review 52 (2002), pp 319-349 Silberman, Linda “The 2019 Judgments Convention: The Need for Comprehensive Federal Implementing Legislation and a Look Back at the ALI Proposed Federal Statute”, NYU School of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. Europäisches Zivilprozess- und Kollisionsrecht, Munich, 5 th ed.
, DePaul Law Review 52 (2002), pp 319-349 Silberman, Linda “The 2019 Judgments Convention: The Need for Comprehensive Federal Implementing Legislation and a Look Back at the ALI Proposed Federal Statute”, NYU School of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. Europäisches Zivilprozess- und Kollisionsrecht, Munich, 5 th ed.
The lecture culminated in a lively discussion regarding the ground of refusal for judgments on exemplary or punitivedamages (Art. Surprisingly, this reasoning according to the Explanatory Report does not apply to punitivedamages exception in Art. 7 (1) lit. 10 ( Garcimartn / Saumier , paras.
The First Circuit—like the Fourth, Ninth, and Tenth Circuits in other climate change cases—concluded that the scope of its appellate review was limited to whether the defendants properly removed the case under the federal-officer removal statute. County of Maui v. Sunoco LP , No. 2CCV-20-0000283 (Haw. Western States Petroleum Association v.
Circuit majority opinion’s interpretation was foreclosed by the statute and violated separation of powers. First, the Supreme Court concluded that the statute requiring Commission approval of affiliated-interest agreement did not require environmental review. The second petition was filed by a coal mining company. County of Maui v.
involving whether punitivedamages that are twice compensatory damages, and fall within a state’s statutory punitivedamages cap, are constitutionally excessive. Three cases involving lawsuits over allegations that police officers used excessive force. Epic Systems Corp v. Tata Consultancy Services Ltd.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content