radical-transparency 
The Process Street
JANUARY 20, 2021
It would be pretty radical right? Or rather, the company in question would be radically transparent. Radical transparency is a phenomenon that’s gaining traction, and this post is here to tell you why. To jump to a specific section of the post click the appropriate link below: What is radical transparency?
JURIST
FEBRUARY 24, 2025
. “Telegram took 160 days to provide information that was asked in the reporting notice, and providing this information so late has obstructed eSafety from delivering its functions under the Online Safety Act for almost half a year,” stated Julie Inman Grant, the eSafety Commissioner, while emphasizing the importance of transparency.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
JURIST
MARCH 21, 2025
Introduced on 8 January 2024, the amended offense intended to prevent the radicalization of young people, as extremist groups increasingly make use of the internet to recruit, spread propaganda and incite violence.
Above The Law
MAY 8, 2025
You cant be transparent if you dont take the time. But they argue that GenAI cannot replace the power skills human attributes that will become even more critical in the future. Legal ops professionals are uniquely positioned to make informed, context-aware decisions something that can’t be offloaded to algorithms alone.
JURIST
SEPTEMBER 10, 2023
This includes how the platform defines and moderates hate speech or racism, extremism or radicalization, disinformation or misinformation, harassment and foreign political interference, as well as information and statistics about actions taken by the platform to moderate these categories.
JURIST
MAY 25, 2021
Under SB 7072 , the Transparency in Technology Act (TITA), social media companies must provide political candidates a platform or “method by which the user may be identified as a qualified candidate,” and social media providers are prohibited from deplatforming or otherwise banning candidates for longer than 14 days. .”
SCOTUSBlog
MAY 3, 2022
Senators heard from five witnesses on recusal practices, the ethics requirements of other branches of the government, and the impact of increased transparency on public trust in the court. But the leaked document became the primary topic of discussion. That is a stunning thing.”.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
124 
Let's personalize your content