article thumbnail

US Supreme Court blocks child slavery lawsuit against Nestlé, Cargill

JURIST

The US Supreme Court on Thursday reversed a ruling that allowed several individuals to sue food corporations Nestlé USA and Cargill over child slavery claims, limiting corporate liability under the Alien Tort Statute. The unnamed plaintiffs brought their cases forward under the Alien Tort Statute. In Jesner v.

Tort 249
article thumbnail

Justices debate state’s right to take tort recoveries from Medicaid beneficiaries

SCOTUSBlog

The statute takes a different approach, though, when a third party caused the injury and so is legally responsible to pay the beneficiary’s expenses. In that case, the state is supposed to “seek reimbursement” from the third party; the statute (in 42 U.S.C.

Tort 115
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Mali former trafficked child laborers sue multinational chocolate companies

JURIST

As there are no laws in Mali to aid the plaintiffs in seeking damages or civil remedies against foreign exporters, they brought their claims under US law, specifically the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act and the Alien Torts Statute. The defendant companies are Barry Callebaut, Cargill, Hershey, Mars, Mondel?z,

Tort 239
article thumbnail

Federal appeals court rejects Pulse Nightclub shooting case against social media giants

JURIST

The first was that the companies violated anti-terrorism statute 18 U.S.C. §§ 2333(a) & (d)(2). The statute allows victims of international terrorism to bring federal lawsuits against perpetrators and collect damages. The court rejected the anti-terrorism claims, as the statute in question requires that terrorism be international.

Statute 207
article thumbnail

US Supreme Court declines North Carolina appeal in undercover investigations case

JURIST

The challenged statute, N.C. The text of the statute covered actions such as unauthorized removal of data or documents, capturing of images, “intentionally” placing unattended recording devices on employer premises or substantially interfering with the employer’s ownership of the property.

article thumbnail

Justices validate states’ right to take tort recoveries from Medicaid beneficiaries

SCOTUSBlog

Justice Clarence Thomas’ opinion for a 7-2 majority treats the case as calling for a straightforward application of the plain language of the statute. Florida’s statute includes a formula that allocates $300,000 to past and future medical expenses. The case, Gallardo v.

Tort 114
article thumbnail

Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of Alien Tort Statute

Constitutional Law Reporter

By a vote of 8-1, the Court held that to plead facts sufficient to support a domestic application of the Alien Tort Statute, 28 U.S.C. Where the statute does not apply extraterritorially, plaintiffs must establish that “the conduct relevant to the statute’s focus occurred in the United States. Facts of the Case.

Tort 59