This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Utah Governor Spencer Cox on Tuesday vetoed Senate Bill 296, a bill that would have granted him the power to appoint the chief justice of the Utah Supreme Court every four years. Presently, the members of the Utah Supreme Court have an exclusive say on who becomes the chief justice.
For Jackson, the key to the case is the reality that under Utah law (the applicable fraudulent conveyance statute), the creditors of the failed business could not recover from the IRS, because the IRSs sovereign immunity would protect it from a suit under the Utahstatute.
A Utah federal court hasn't seen sufficient evidence to block the Corporate Transparency Act's disclosure requirements in presentations by an off-the-grid community, an online meat market and a trade group for cattle producers that have sued over the statute, the federal government said.
Several small-business associations in Utah became the latest group to challenge the Corporate Transparency Act's disclosure requirements, telling a federal court Monday the statute violates several constitutional provisions, including the guarantee of due process.
A group of Utah residents backed by a free speech advocacy group is suing officials in Utah over the state's new social media age verification law, saying the statute violates Utahns' First Amendment rights in a one-size-fits-allapproach.
During a question-and-answer session following her speech, I asked her about the stalled efforts to bring about reform in California and what the Supreme Court could do to move the issue forward, particularly in light of the leading roles taken by the supreme courts of Arizona and Utah to bring about reforms in those states.
The Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas reversed the Board’s decision without affording any deference to the agency’s interpretation of the relevant statute. Later, the Ohio First District Court of Appeals held that a court must defer to an administrative interpretation only if the court finds a statute to be ambiguous.
The US District Court in Utah released a well-reasoned decision finding that the service, by transmitting via the Internet over-the-air TV programming to subscribers without any consent from the TV stations or their program suppliers, violated the copyrights that the stations have in their programming. Aereo finally lost a court decision.
Meanwhile, the water level at Lake Powell, the massive reservoir created by the Glen Canyon Dam on the Utah-Arizona border, is at historic lows, threatening its ability to generate power. They argue that the jurisdictional threshold under the APA is less demanding than statutes allowing for money damages. The 1964 Arizona v.
Next, NC Financial Solutions of Utah, LLC v. NC Financial Solutions of Utah, LLC v. Virginia concerns the power of a state attorney general to bring lawsuits on behalf of private parties who would otherwise be subject to an arbitration agreement.
4th __, the majority, using California choice-of-law principles, applied a Utahstatute of limitations instead of a California statute to hold a childhood sexual abuse lawsuit was time barred. Logan River Academy (10th Cir., 14, 2021, No. 20-4074) __ F.4th ’ ”.
McDonough , a case that the court already rescheduled seven times last term, and which involves the construction of a statute providing disability pay for members of the military. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, by a divided vote , deferred to the Department of Veterans Affairs construction of the statute under Chevron U.S.A.,
also a Navajo Nation citizen, on the Ute Mountain Ute Indian Reservation, which is located in Colorado, New Mexico, and Utah. The statute was later amended to allow, in limited situations, tribal court sentences of up to three years. Denezpi, a citizen of the Navajo Nation, is accused of a July 2017 sexual offense against V.Y.,
More fallout is still to come as approximately a quarter of the postconviction challenges involve crimes already beyond the federal statute of limitations. Kennon Tubbs is a private medical doctor who provided medical services at a county jail in Utah. The total population of Oklahoma is just under four million residents.
To eliminate the financial burden that reservists face when called to active duty at pay rates below their federal civilian salaries, Congress enacted the differential pay statute, 5 U.S.C. In this case, the Surface Transportation Board relied on Public Citizen to cabin its environmental review of a new rail line in Utah.
I asked her if Utah and Arizona were the first dominoes that would set off a chain reaction of other states following suit. It focuses on the Rules of Professional Conduct, and suggests that there is no parallel way to regulate alternative legal services providers – a suggestion already disproven in both Arizona and Utah.
I asked her if Utah and Arizona were the first dominoes that would set off a chain reaction of other states following suit. It focuses on the Rules of Professional Conduct, and suggests that there is no parallel way to regulate alternative legal services providers – a suggestion already disproven in both Arizona and Utah.
Here, first the conflict-of-law issue to be dealt with is the source of law that is to be used to determine the relevant statute for recourse. In its decision of 3 March 2021, the Federal Court of Justice endorsed an alternative approach based on Article 19 of the Rome II Regulation and Article 7 para.
The federal district court for the District of Columbia granted BLM’s and federal officials’ motion for voluntary remand without vacatur of claims that they failed to comply with NEPA in connection with 27 oil and gas leasing decisions across Colorado, Utah, Wyoming, New Mexico, and Montana between September 2016 and March 2019.
The trial penalty that coaxes both the guilty and innocent to enter pleas is exacerbated by mandatory minimum statutes, which trigger automatic penalties if invoked by the prosecutor, as well as sentencing enhancements within the discretion of the prosecutor, such as whether to file notice with the court of a prior offense.
Study of environmental impacts of crude oil production The Seven County Infrastructure Coalition wants to build a new 88-mile common carrier rail line that would link an isolated part of Utah to the national rail network. It sought and received the Surface Transportation Board’s approval to do so. In Seven County Infrastructure Coalition v.
A court in Israel has ordered the government there to recognize marriages conducted by an officiant in Utah between Israelis attending remotely via videoconferencing from Israel. Why, you ask, would Israelis be interested in being married under Utah law? Cyprus is a typical destination.
Because the company received no value in exchange for those tax payments (which paid debts owed by its owners), and because the company was insolvent at the time, they are the kind of payment covered by Utah’s Uniform Fraudulent Transfers Act. The big problem is that the payment was made to the IRS rather than a private creditor.
The court found that “the statute is not narrowly tailored and chills the speech of Plaintiffs and adults who wish to access sexual materials. [it] These laws have been enacted in other states, including Louisiana, Mississippi, Virginia and Utah. Judge Ezra ruled that “H.B. 1181 is unconstitutional on its face.”
There is a troubling case in Panguitch, Utah where a woman has reportedly been charged with a hate crim e for allegedly “stomping on a ‘Back the Blue’ sign” at a gas station. For we are presented with a clear and simple statute to be judged against a pure command of the Constitution. The outcome can be laid at no door but ours.
The federal district court for the District of South Dakota temporarily enjoined enforcement of provisions of a riot boosting statute enacted in South Dakota in 2019 in response to anticipated protests of the Keystone XL pipeline. In re Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance , No. IBLA 2019 94 (IBLA Sept. NEW CASES, MOTIONS, AND NOTICES.
5] The statute requires plan fiduciaries act “solely in the interest of” and “for the exclusive purpose of. 31, 2023), [link] [2] See generally Complaint, Utah v. 1] Shortly thereafter, the 2022 rule gave rise to litigation that was led by 25 Republican attorney generals. [2] population.” [3] Walsh, 23-cv-00016 (N.D. 26, 2023). [3]
Earlier this month, the Utah House of Representative’s Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Committee, after lengthy and passionate debate, narrowly defeated a bill to repeal the death penalty. The death penalty was often described in Utah as “blood atonement “?the Executions are rare in Utah and so is the method.
In a unanimous decision, the Utah Supreme Court decided Thursday that Utah citizens have a constitutional right to reform their government in response to past redistricting efforts to divide Salt Lake City into four congressional districts, resulting in Republicans winning by a large margin.
Louisiana filed suit in the US District Court for its Western District, leading a cohort comprising Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Georgia, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Oklahoma, Texas, Utah and West Virginia.
15] However, while this did give major league baseball players standing to bring antitrust claims against Major League Baseball (“MLB”), the statute is notoriously confusing with respect to all other parties. Senator for Utah, supra note 2; Arcieri, supra note 2. [28] 16] However, there is a split on this issue, such as in Piazza v.
After Temporarily Blocking Activity on Helium Extraction Project in Southeastern Utah, Federal Court Denied Emergency Injunctive Relief. Bureau of Land Management (BLM) of a helium extraction project in an area of the San Rafael Desert in southeastern Utah covered by an oil and gas lease sold in December 2018. 20-472 (U.S. Dingell, Jr.
There are rare patent cases that challenge the validity of the patent statutes or the way those statutes are applied by the PTO (e.g., Patent cases appear to be excluded from the policy; they do seek to force or prohibit any federal action. Vidal , challenging the PTO’s use of ‘discretionary’ denials of inter partes review petitions).
While the decision has been appealed , a federal district court in Utah v. Under Chevron , a reviewing court examines the statute under which an agency claims the authority to regulate, to see if Congressional intent is clear. In the Utah v. There is, however, a notable exception to this trend. Raimondo and Relentless v.
So-called “trigger” laws have already gone into effect in states where anti-abortion statutes are already on the books have been activated by the decision. HB314 reinforced Alabama statute banning abortion that was never appealed after it was made unenforceable under Roe. Law: Utah SB174 2020. No exception for rape or incest.
The magistrate judge concluded that the suit was barred by the statute of limitations. The court further found that the plaintiffs conceded that venue in Boulder County was not proper for San Miguel under this statute. Lawsuits Challenged NEPA Reviews for Oil and Gas Lease Sales in Colorado, New Mexico, Utah, and Wyoming.
Supreme Court held that the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals erred when it concluded that its review of the remand order in Baltimore’s climate change case against fossil fuel companies was limited to determining whether the defendants properly removed the case under the federal officer removal statute. Louisiana v. Biden , No. May 10, 2021).
Within ERISA’s framework, from which state-by-state deviation is not allowed, is language at issue in an appeal in Utah v. The appeal of Utah v. Walsh (now called Utah v. Walsh , an important pending discussed further below. Su ) also involves fiduciary duties under ERISA.
The Court held that the provision used “extension” in its “temporal sense,” but that the statute did not impose a “continuity requirement” and instead allowed small refineries to apply for hardship extensions “at any time.” BLM Dropped Appeal of Adverse Decision on Environmental Review for Utah Coal Mine Expansion. June 22, 2021).
Thus, for example, the Secretary of the Interior has previously cancelled leases that were issued before the requirements of NEPA and other statutes were met. This has been interpreted as authorizing the cancellation of leases “issued in violation of. procedural requirements.” There is a catch, however.
The defendants filed their reply brief on January 22, 2020, reiterating their arguments that the Tenth Circuit should review the entire remand order, not just the district court’s determination that removal was not proper under the federal-officer removal statute, and that there were multiple valid grounds for removal. City of Oakland v.
To the contrary, in the year it was ratified (1868), thirty of thirty-seven states explicitly criminalized abortion by statute.” According to the group, the court wrongly concluded in Roe that the 19th-century statutes had been enacted to protect women from dangerous operations, rather than to protect fetuses.
Circuit majority opinion’s interpretation was foreclosed by the statute and violated separation of powers. The federal defendants, the States of Wyoming and Utah, and several trade groups appealed the district court’s November 2020 decision. WildEarth Guardians v. Haaland , Nos. 21-5006, 21-5020, 21-5021, 21-5023, 21-5024 (D.C.
The court also noted that states and localities “expressly maintain control over the local distribution of natural gas under related federal statutes” such as the Natural Gas Act. holding that the scope of appellate review of remand orders extended beyond review of removal based on the federal-officer removal statute.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content