This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Here’s the Tuesday morning read: Supreme Court Is Asked to Hear a New Admissions Case on Race (Stephanie Saul & Adam Liptak, The New York Times) The Supreme Court and the Federal Officer Removal Statute (Steve Vladeck, One First) Supreme Court Blocks WestVirginia Bid to Challenge CFPB Funding (Evan Weinberger, Bloomberg Law) The Supreme Court (..)
Before his death, decedent filed suit for personal injury and loss of consortium in WestVirginia. The Court explained: Here, Decedent brought suit in WestVirginia for personal injury and loss of consortium. Decedent was, obviously, still living at the time of his reaching a settlement in the WestVirginia litigation. …
When Allen Loughry II, the former chief justice of the Supreme Court of Appeals of WestVirginia, was convicted of wire and mail fraud in 2018, discussion about the case, predictably, spread on Twitter. In Loughry v. The First Step Act amended 18 U.S.C. §
That prompted the challengers – Ohio, Indiana, and WestVirginia, along with trade associations and companies affected by the plan – to come to the Supreme Court last fall, asking the justices to intervene. Court of Appeals for the D.C. In a brief, unsigned order on Dec. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Feb.
United States , the justices will return to a familiar statute: the Armed Career Criminal Act, which imposes an enhanced sentence for unlawful possession of a firearm if the defendant has three convictions “committed on occasions different from one another.” And in Erlinger v. The court designated six cases as bellwether cases.
The 2017 Supreme Court decision in TC Heartland gave renewed teeth to the venue statute governing litigation. Here, Mylan created its ANDA documents at its WestVirginia office and submitted them electronically from that location. Celgene Corp. Mylan Pharma ( Fed. Lets talk first about acts of infringement.
Carole Johnson (consolidated cases), the Court found that the conditions set by Novartis and United Therapeutics on covered entities did not violate the 340B statute, although more restrictive conditions could violate the law. District Court and won, prompting a government appeal to the D.C. In affirming the District Court’s ruling, the D.C.
Following an explosion at a coal mine in WestVirginia that killed 29 miners, federal prosecutors charged Don Blankenship, then the CEO of the company that owned and operated the mine, with willfully violating safety regulations. Planned Parenthood South Atlantic.
The Navajo Nation reservation is about the size of Ireland or WestVirginia, with large portions bordered by the Colorado River. Over one hundred years ago, the Supreme Court found that the creation of Indian reservations arising from Indian land cession treaties in the arid west necessarily created Indian reserved water rights.
Ohio, Indiana, and WestVirginia filed suit, arguing that EPA’s rulemaking process circumvented the Clean Air Act’s cooperative-federalism mandate by forcing its own top-down control over state-level air-pollution reduction, and moved to stay the federal plan pending judicial review. Warner Chappell Music, Inc.
The 87 enactments in the collection encompass statutes and appropriations bills that were passed by Congress and signed by the president—including every president since President Jimmy Carter. The United States Supreme Court’s opinion in WestVirginia v.
By statute, certain activities are automatically excluded from particular DSCSA requirements upon the declaration of a public health emergency under section 319 of the PHS Act. WestVirginia ), there is no such definition in FDA regulations or in the DSCSA. While certain states do define “harm reduction programs” (e.g.,
PJM determined that a project proposed by Transource consisting of new transmission lines running from WestVirginia to Maryland would reduce this congestion and provide net positive economic benefits. PJM therefore concluded that there was a public need for the project, based on FERC-approved methods for determining public need.
The court said the statutory language authorized courts to grant stays and that EPA’s reading of the statute “would have the perverse result of empowering this court to act when the agency denies a stay but not when it chooses to grant one.” filed June 5, 2017; emergency motion for stay granted July 3, 2017). DECISIONS AND SETTLEMENTS.
See Pennsylvania General Assembly Statute §7102. That much was clear given his response to finding fake spiders scattered around the WestVirginia office for Halloween. OUTCOME: Reversed dismissal on the basis of tolling of statute of limitations. White clearly does not like spiders, even fake ones. 32; 285 S.W.
See Pennsylvania General Assembly Statute §7102. That much was clear given his response to finding fake spiders scattered around the WestVirginia office for Halloween. OUTCOME: Reversed dismissal on the basis of tolling of statute of limitations. White clearly does not like spiders, even fake ones. 32; 285 S.W.
Ergon-WestVirginia, Inc. The companies filed their brief on November 16, arguing that the Fourth Circuit erred by concluding that it was limited to reviewing removal based on the federal-officer removal statute. 19-2128 (4th Cir. Ninth Circuit Rejected Claim That CEQA Applied to Taxi Rules for Airport Pickups.
Anderson 24-90 Issues : (1) Whether WestVirginia violated the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment by declining to cover surgical treatments for gender dysphoria; and (2) whether WestVirginia violated the Medicaid Act and the Affordable Care Act by declining to cover surgical treatments for gender dysphoria.
51] That doctrine only applies to federal regulations, however, not to state statutes, so it does not pose a danger to the two California bills. cit [50] See, e.g., WestVirginia v. Moreover, the Supreme Court recently signaled again that states are free to enact environmental laws that may be beyond federal powers. [52]
The latter program was at issue in last Monday’s oral arguments — specifically, whether Wisconsin Bell, a midwestern offspring of the former AT&T monopoly, can be sued under an anti-fraud statute for overcharging schools and libraries for phone and internet service. WestVirginia v.
640 (2000), WestVirginia Bd. In Barnette , the Court held that the State of WestVirginia’s efforts to compel schoolchildren to salute the Nation’s flag and recite the Pledge of Allegiance “invad[ed] the sphere of intellect and spirit which it is the purpose of the First Amendment. Dale , 530 U.S. Barnette , 319 U.S.
Accepting the government’s theory, it says, “would perversely erode women’s rights and jeopardize landmark statutes protecting women’s equal access to schools, winners’ podiums, and beyond.” A decision in the case is expected by summer 2025. This article was originally published at Howe on the Court.
Stillie , the case challenging Alaska’s disclosure requirement statute for political contributions. s mother, sued WestVirginia on her behalf. Steven Agee dissented , concluding that “WestVirginia may separate its sports teams by biological sex without running afoul of either the Equal Protection Clause or Title IX.”
The statute creating the Universal Service Fund outlines the general policy that Congress wanted the agency to follow for example, ensuring that internet and telephone services are affordable, providing reasonably comparable services to rural areas, and making sure that schools and libraries have access to those services.
There are several statutes that form the basis of our antitrust laws. WestVirginia was the first state to bar financial firms from engaging in new state business upon determination that they engage in boycott activities. And what are the permissible boundaries of that behavior? What is a Boycott, according to antitrust law?
Joe Manchin, a WestVirginia Democrat, the act also included a provision that ordered federal agencies to issue any permits needed to complete the pipeline. As the dispute came to the Supreme Court, it centered on legislation enacted earlier this year by Congress to expedite the pipeline’s completion. As a concession to Sen.
WestVirginia v. The federal district court for the District of South Dakota temporarily enjoined enforcement of provisions of a riot boosting statute enacted in South Dakota in 2019 in response to anticipated protests of the Keystone XL pipeline. The court dismissed the proceedings 11 days after the effective date of the U.S.
See Pennsylvania General Assembly Statute §7102. That much was clear given his response to finding fake spiders scattered around the WestVirginia office for Halloween. OUTCOME: Reversed dismissal on the basis of tolling of statute of limitations. White clearly does not like spiders, even fake ones. Trimble ␣ 315 Mo.
And the CFPB’s funding statute is “not materially distinct from” those of other financial regulators such as the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, and the Federal Reserve Board itself, the CFPB asserts.
Justice John Paul Stevens set out a two-part test for courts to review an agency’s interpretation of a statute it administers. If it has not, the court must uphold the agency’s interpretation of the statute as long as it is reasonable.
The US Supreme Court Thursday ruled that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) does not have the authority under section 111(d) of the Clean Air Act to enforce proposed power plant emission limitations in WestVirginia v. ” In WestVirginia v.
Louisiana filed suit in the US District Court for its Western District, leading a cohort comprising Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Georgia, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Oklahoma, Texas, Utah and WestVirginia.
The US Supreme Court heard oral arguments Monday in WestVirginia v. Environmental Protection Agency , a major test of the agency’s authority to regulate greenhouse gas emissions. In 2015 the Obama administration’s EPA adopted the Clean Power Plan (CPP), which was blocked by the Supreme Court.
The New Jersey court also found no basis for Grable jurisdiction, rejecting the companies’ arguments that the City’s claims necessarily raised substantial and actually disputed issues of federal law such as First Amendment issues or issues addressed by federal environmental statutes. WestVirginia v.
Empire Health Foundation did not mention Chevron at all, even though Chevron loomed large in the briefing for both cases, which involved agency interpretations of complex Medicare statutes. Instead, the court simply interpreted the two statutes at issue by looking primarily at the statutes’ text and structure.
In its legislative findings, which remain in air quality statutes today , Congress justified air pollution regulation because “the growth of the amount and complexity of air pollution brought about by urbanization, industrial development, and the increasing use of motor vehicles, has resulted in mounting dangers to the public health and welfare.”
WestVirginia Court Dismissed Defamation Suit Against John Oliver Brought by Coal Executive and His Companies. A WestVirginia state court notified counsel that it would dismiss the lawsuit brought by coal executive Robert E. Jacobson v. Clack , No. 2017 CA 006685 B (D.C. notice of dismissal and statement Feb.
Supreme Court held that the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals erred when it concluded that its review of the remand order in Baltimore’s climate change case against fossil fuel companies was limited to determining whether the defendants properly removed the case under the federal officer removal statute. May 10, 2021).
The court also granted motions to strike the state law claims pursuant to California’s anti-SLAPP (Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation) statute. Murray Energy also moved in the federal district court for the Northern District of WestVirginia to amend the order of dismissal with prejudice issued by the court on October 2, 2017.
Senator Joe Machin, a Democrat from WestVirginia who chairs the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, criticized the new rule, saying, “This will only lead to more costly delays and litigation. Meaningful community engagement is the key to unlocking our clean energy future.” ” U.S.
Issue : Whether a state statute that expressly caps punitive damages at two times compensatory damages satisfies the notice requirement of the due process clause such that a punitive damages award that complies with the statute is constitutionally sound under the due process clause. WestVirginia v. Epic Systems Corp v.
Instead, the CDC has imposed a nationwide moratorium on evictions in reliance on a decades-old statute that authorizes it to implement measures like fumigation and pest extermination. It strains credulity to believe that this statute grants the CDC the sweeping authority that it asserts.” In WestVirginia v.
The case, WestVirginia v. Lindsay See, the solicitor general of WestVirginia, urged the court to go ahead and decide the case. WestVirginia Solicitor General Lindsay See argues for a group of red states. Standing is no reason to avoid the merits” of the case, she stressed.
The first petition was filed by WestVirginia and 18 other states that had intervened to defend the repeal and replacement rule, known as the Affordable Clean Energy rule. Circuit majority opinion’s interpretation was foreclosed by the statute and violated separation of powers. WestVirginia v. 20-1530 (U.S.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content