This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Given the increase in employees workingfromhome in recent years, the question has arisen as to whether an employee’s home office is considered a “regular and established place of business” for the purposes of patent venue.
They try to restrict the freedoms of the people by changing statutes overnight. However, during the pandemic, you must workfromhome and limit your travels. Flexibility in working conditions. Office-based workers now workfromhome to protect themselves from COVID-19.
The relevant statute reads as follows: For the convenience of parties and witnesses, in the interest of justice, a district court may transfer any civil action to any other district or division where it might have been brought or to any district or division to which all parties have consented.
There was a surge of workingfromhome and virtual working as a result of the pandemic, and many firms may still be operating like that. Still, whether this high rate continues to climb or plateaus will be interesting as firms face the question of returning to their office or allowing people to workfromhome.
BADC cites the late Justice Scalia’s admonition that courts must avoid interpretations “[incompatible] with the reason [and] purpose of the statute.” Congress did not intend for the USPTO to have that latitude. Antonin Scalia, Judicial Deference to Administrative Interpretations of Law , 1989 Duke L.J. ” 5 U.S.C. §
There is also evidence that workingfromhome was harder for smaller-firm lawyers than for their larger-firm counterparts. The effects of the pandemic have changed how legal professionals view the concept of ‘work’ and where they get it done. But workingfromhome a few days each week?
One final note on the winding route to where I am now: I like to think that I was ahead of the work-from-home trend, given I actually started workingfromhome in 2018, after years in an office. Other departments come to us in part for our thoroughness. They count on us to catch what they might miss.
There is also evidence that workingfromhome was harder for smaller-firm lawyers than for their larger-firm counterparts. The effects of the pandemic have changed how legal professionals view the concept of ‘work’ and where they get it done. But workingfromhome a few days each week?
Listen, I know that occasionally you have to bring workhome, but you can’t get into the habit of workingfromhome after work. When I had several cases in litigation, I was detached at home most days and I had to make a change. I’m so much more mindful of my time now both as a mom and as a paralegal.
Elie Mystal explaining that statutes of limitations are a thing. [ Maybe firms should drop the draconian office surveillance policies and go back to workingfromhome when they were profitable. [ Politico ] * Speaking of DeSantis, some more on the Disney fiasco with a nice pull quote! [ I'll show myself out.
corporations can be sued for violations of the Alien Tort Statute, the law on which the Iraqi plaintiffs were relying, at all. The issue arose during the COVID-19 pandemic, when Massachusetts opted to continue taxing out-of-state residents who had worked in the state prior to the pandemic but began to workfromhome.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content