This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The department pointed to the Arizona statute allowing a defendant sentenced to death to choose between lethal injection or lethal gas at least 20 days before the execution date. Lethal gas is permitted for executions in six other states: Alabama, California, Mississippi, Missouri, Oklahoma and Wyoming.
United States featured sharply different interpretations of the contribution provisions of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, also known as CERCLA or the Superfund statute. Guam is appealing a ruling by the U.S. Navy for the cost of cleaning up the Ordot Dump. But the U.S.
Under the federal statute governing these contracts, tribes can then keep third-party insurance revenue so long as they spend it on health care. To comply with both its Indian Health Service contract and the federal statute, the court of appeals explained, the tribe has to spend revenue from third parties on health care programs.
While certain of these advantages exist to varying degrees in other states, such as Nevada or Wyoming, and it often makes sense to incorporate them in your home state, it is still the case that no other state has the historical depth of case law and sophisticated jurisprudence as Delaware.
Ohio is currently home to more than 15 Fortune 500 companies and offers a statute-based approach to corporate law, which offers companies increased stability. [19] 23, 2024), [link] ; see also Pierluigi Matera, Delaware’s Dominance, Wyoming’s Dare: New Challenge, Same Outcome? , Bauman, 571 U.S. 117, 137 (2014). [5]
So whether you are a small AM station in the middle of Wyoming or a monster FM in New York City, the formula used to calculate the rates that apply to commercial radio stations are the same. Are existing antitrust statutes and applicable caselaw sufficient to protect competition in the absence of the Consent Decrees?
Federal Court Found Flaws in New Climate Change Analysis for Wyoming Oil and Gas Leases. BLM approved these leases prior to the court’s decision in March 2019 (also noted in the Feature Case, above) finding that BLM’s analysis of the climate change impacts of certain other oil and gas leases in Wyoming was insufficient.
Wyoming legislators are developing two hate crime bills for next year’s legislative session, The Associated Press reported. The delay is especially poignant since the murder of gay University of Wyoming student Matthew Shepard in 1998 prompted at least 47 states have adopted hate crime legislation, according to the Brennan Center for Justice.
Share This week we highlight cert petitions that ask the Supreme Court to consider, among other things, whether the House of Representatives may vote by proxy, when the statute of limitations begins for state prisoners seeking DNA testing, a football coach’s post-game prayer and Texas’ new anti-abortion law.
Wyoming Federal Court Vacated 2016 Waste Prevention Rule. The federal district court for the District of Wyoming vacated the bulk of the Waste Prevention Rule promulgated during the Obama administration, holding that the U.S. After that court vacated the repeal in July 2020, the Wyoming federal court lifted the stay.
” Wyoming filed a separate complaint in the federal District Court for its own state. ” Wyoming also alleges that the Department of the Interior implemented a “clever scheme … to shroud” its actions “from both the public view and judicial review.”
The Problem of Methane Leaks from Federally Managed Lands BLM administers an oil and gas leasing program on public lands under a variety of statutes, including the Mineral Leasing Act (“MLA”), the Federal Land Policy and Management Act, and the Indian Mineral Development Act. While Wyoming v. DOI , 493 F. 3d 1046 (D.
The First Circuit—like the Fourth, Ninth, and Tenth Circuits in other climate change cases—concluded that the scope of its appellate review was limited to whether the defendants properly removed the case under the federal-officer removal statute. On October 8, the District of Wyoming vacated the 2016 rule, with judgment entered on October 23.
corporations can be sued for violations of the Alien Tort Statute, the law on which the Iraqi plaintiffs were relying, at all. And in the second case, Montana and Wyoming v. In August 2020, then-Acting Solicitor General Jeffrey Wall suggested that the justices put CACI’s case on hold until their ruling in Nestle v.
Zinke , where the court held that BLM failed to adequately analyze greenhouse gas emissions and climate change impacts of oil and gas leases in Wyoming. 1442, or the civil-rights removal statute, 28 U.S.C. The plaintiffs alleged that BLM recognized, based on WildEarth Guardians v.
California Federal Court Barred BLM from Enforcing Delay of Oil and Natural Gas Waste Prevention Rule; States, Trade Groups Asked Wyoming Court to Expedite Review of Rule and Suspend Deadlines. The court also denied motions to transfer the action to the District of Wyoming, where a challenge to the Waste Prevention Rule is pending.
Supreme Court held that the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals erred when it concluded that its review of the remand order in Baltimore’s climate change case against fossil fuel companies was limited to determining whether the defendants properly removed the case under the federal officer removal statute. Conservation Congress v. May 17, 2021).
The magistrate judge concluded that the suit was barred by the statute of limitations. The court further found that the plaintiffs conceded that venue in Boulder County was not proper for San Miguel under this statute. WildEarth Guardians v. Mountain Coal Co. , 1:20-cv-01342 (D. Coverage of the oral argument is available here.
The court also granted motions to strike the state law claims pursuant to California’s anti-SLAPP (Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation) statute. Wyoming Asked to Intervene to Defend Delisting of Yellowstone Grizzlies. The court granted the company leave to amend its complaint with 21 days. Resolute Forest Products, Inc.
The defendants filed their reply brief on January 22, 2020, reiterating their arguments that the Tenth Circuit should review the entire remand order, not just the district court’s determination that removal was not proper under the federal-officer removal statute, and that there were multiple valid grounds for removal. City of Oakland v.
Thus, for example, the Secretary of the Interior has previously cancelled leases that were issued before the requirements of NEPA and other statutes were met. This has been interpreted as authorizing the cancellation of leases “issued in violation of. procedural requirements.” There is a catch, however.
After the Louisiana federal court issued the nationwide injunction, the federal district court for the District of Wyoming issued a sua sponte order in a separate case challenging the pause on new onshore leasing. On June 30, the Wyoming federal court denied the motions without prejudice, finding that they were “materially moot.”
Circuit majority opinion’s interpretation was foreclosed by the statute and violated separation of powers. Parties Voluntarily Dismissed Appeals of Federal Court Decision Requiring More Climate Change Analysis for Wyoming Oil and Gas Leases. Federal Court Allowed Trade Group and Wyoming to Intervene in Challenge to Oil and Gas Leases.
in which the Ninth Circuit affirmed a district court finding that the federal-officer removal statute did not provide jurisdiction. Citing “Unique Background” of Case, Montana Federal Court Rejected Transfer of Claims Regarding Public Lands in Wyoming. Chevron Corp.
The court also noted that states and localities “expressly maintain control over the local distribution of natural gas under related federal statutes” such as the Natural Gas Act. holding that the scope of appellate review of remand orders extended beyond review of removal based on the federal-officer removal statute.
In Minnesota, the district court granted the State of Minnesota’s motion to remand its case, which asserts state law claims under common law and consumer protection statutes. s consumer protection statute. 24, 2021); Wyoming v. Louisiana v. Biden , No. 2:21-cv-00778 (W.D. Department of Interior , No. 0:21-cv-00056 (D.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content