This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
It is not possible to talk about eDiscovery or document review heading in to 2021 without mention of technology-assistedreview. In its broadest use as a technical term, TAR can refer to virtually any manner of technical assistance. In this narrower sense, TAR often comes with a version number – TAR 1.0,
For at least two decades, artificial intelligence has been used in e-discovery to help surface and prioritize review of potentially responsive documents from large document collections.
Learn how adopting new technologies built for big data can help to maximize budgets, optimize resources, and make strategic business decisions. The post Demystifying TAR And Advanced AI To Up-Level Your eDiscovery appeared first on Above the Law.
The ABA TechReport combines data from the annual ABA Legal Technology Survey Report with expert analysis, observations, and predictions from leaders in the legal technology field. LiveNote is owned by West, A Thomson Reuters Business, which is a sponsor of the Litigation Technology & E-Discovery Survey.
is the understanding of preserving, processing, reviewing, and producing electronically stored information (ESI). If your profession includes anything related to litigation (paralegal, attorney, support staff, technology person, project manager, etc.), Ediscovery Technology Explained. How Does the Technology Work?
Tremendous opportunities exist for transactional practitioners to leverage technology to optimize outcomes. Each trend has its roots in the now well-established field of litigation-support technology. Another important tool in the litigator’s toolbox is TechnologyAssistedReview (TAR). Automation.
E-discovery company Casepoint is today introducing enhancements to CaseAssist, its AI-based active reviewtechnology, and to its analytics and classification tools, that it says give users more insight and control over the review process, including enhanced visualization capabilities and configuration templates.
Lighthouse said that this acquisition marks its first entry into document review, with the addition of advanced search and analytics technology, and experts who can help clients use these tools to find and classify sensitive data and automate key review workflows. The companies did not reveal terms of the deal.
In a nutshell, modern law refers to the idea of taking a business-centered approach to legal practice by embracing emerging technologies and new partnerships to increase efficiency and make smarter operational decisions. The Survival of the (Technologically) Fittest. Moving to the cloud.
In an interview in advance of the keynote, Brown, the chief product officer, told me that, at this point in its development, aiR is supplemental to other forms of AI-assistedreview, such as active learning or technologyassistedreview.
Alex Chatzistamatis, senior principal enterprise architect with Nuix, discusses the ways that technological advancements like machine learning and artificial intelligence are shaping the future of e-discovery and other areas of the legal profession. So that’s a huge component. These days, we call it CAL, continuous active learning.
Use advanced technologies. Technology is a foundational enabler for meeting the scale and speed challenges of second requests while avoiding exorbitant costs. Project managers must immediately communicate any changes in strategy and ensure those changes are implemented in all relevant workflows and technologies. Conclusion.
” The product is Merlin Integrated Search (IS), from the company Merlin Search Technologies, which describes it as the first Search 2.0 The chief data scientist who helped develop it said it is “an order of magnitude faster than anything on the market.” Catalyst was acquired by OpenText for $75 million in 2019.
Courts often subject parties using technologyassistedreview to greater scrutiny than parties conducting linear, manual document review, so parties using large language models for document review should expect even more attention, along with a corresponding need for quality control and validation, say attorneys at Sidley.
Today’s machine learning technology can work through the data faster and more effectively than search term negotiations ever could. Advanced analytics tools can quickly weed out non-responsive documents, so it makes sense to use the technology at the beginning of the review process — even before a human puts eyes on anything.
Michael has been consulting in e-discovery, information governance, project management and legal technology for 25 years, including 10-year stints at Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom LLP and Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP. He frequently writes and speaks on e-discovery, legal operations, project management and technology topics.
[{"content":{"text":" When ChatGPT was released two years ago, attorneys and legal technology experts had one big question: Whatu2019s going to change? While the ethical and regulatory implications of the technology remain to be seen, its potential to transform the way attorneys get work done is undeniable. It's not hard to see why.
Especially when it comes to technology, many lawyers are reluctant to put their confidence in workflows and solutions that seem to operate in a black box. Technology-assistedreview is a prime example—although the use of predictive coding and other advanced analytics have been widely accepted in the U.S. About the Author.
With workplace and regulatory investigations on the rise, leveraging e-discovery technologies are no longer exclusively a litigation-specific endeavor. As such, the principles and criteria guiding the management of investigations differ from those guiding a responsive review.
Similarly, Epiqs launch of Epiq AI Labs and its AI Discovery Assistant earlier this year evinces a clear move toward foundational AI infrastructure, not just a simple point solution. The tool is designed to automate over 80% of review processes and complete them up to 90% faster than TAR.
Other teams rely on their information technology (IT) teams to search for and send them personal storage table (PST) files for manual review, only to find they need more emails or data from other custodians. What are essential technology capabilities that legal teams should look for regarding ECA and investigations?
However, with over 77 percent of respondents to The 2024 In-House Legal Technology Report stating that time spent on manual daily tasks detracts from their ability to support wider business goals, it’s clear that when it comes to inefficient legal workflows, it’s our highest-value work that is suffering the most.
Meta’s announcement on January 12 notes the “rising phenomenon” of synthetic media – an umbrella term for images, video, voice, or text generated by computerized technology, typically using artificial intelligence (“AI”) or automation. Who (or what) are virtual influencers? Gamekeeper, or poacher?
Unstructured content in documents is expensive to review because, predominantly, a human being is examining the content to decide whether and how it is relevant to the issues in scope (perhaps assisted with document technologyassistedreview).
We can use AI, TAR, clustering, threading, offshore coding, onshore coding. All these are great techniques that are very economical, but at the end of the day, the volume of documents continues to increase at a rate that seems to outpace the efficiencies gained by technology. Where will they put their attention?
The federal district court for the District of Columbia upheld the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s (NOAA’s) redaction of certain communications between a NOAA climate scientist and the director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) from January 20, 2009, through January 20, 2017.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content