This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Information is now available on the number of tort trials and jury verdicts in Davidson County, Tennessee for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2022. There were 1883 tort cases filed in Davidson County (not including health care liability act cases) and 41 tort trials.
Information is now available on the number of tort trials and jury verdicts in Hamilton County, Tennessee for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2022. There were 797 tort cases closed in Hamilton County (not including health care liability act cases) and 27 tort trials.
There are seven tort cases pending before the Tennessee Supreme Court. Here is a list of the cases and the summary of the holding of the Tennessee Court of Appeals (if applicable) in each case: Style: Williams v. Smyrna Residential, LLC et al. TSC Docket Number: M2021-00927-SC-R11-CV Continue reading
Tennessee’s tort and health care liability action trials came near to a screeching half for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2021. There were only 31 jury and 113 nonjury tort trials in twelve months, and only 1 jury and 7 nonjury health care liability cases tried during the same period. of cases). (We Dyer 1 (nonjury).
Information is now available on the number of tort trials and jury verdicts in Shelby County, Tennessee for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2022. There were 2164 tort cases closed in Shelby County (not including health care liability act cases) and 55 tort trials.
Last week, the Tennessee Supreme Court agreed to hear two new cases. One is a tort case. National Treasury Employees Union, Chapter 39 addresses the torts of malicious prosecution and civil conspiracy. The other, City of Knoxville, Tennessee v.
Tennessee does not recognize a common law cause of action for wrongful foreclosure. 14, 2024), the Tennessee Supreme Court held that there is no tort for wrongful foreclosure in Tennessee. The Supreme Court, however, ruled that no such claim exists in Tennessee. Wilmington Trust, N.A. , 3d — (Tenn.
23, 2024), plaintiff filed a complaint alleging several tort claims, including assault, battery, and trespass. A third complaint filed more than one year after dismissal of the original complaint did not fall within the savings statute and was time barred. In Abdou v. Brown , No. 2023-01593-COA-R3-CV (Tenn.
On June 1 the Tennessee Supreme Court issued an opinion in State v. So, why bring that up in a tort law blog? ” Our “ Status of Cases Pending Before the Tennessee Supreme Court ” book gives you not only a list of the cases pending before the court but also lets you know the status of them.
Note: Chapter 64, Section 5 of Day on Torts: Leading Cases in TennesseeTort Law has been updated to include this decision. Day on Torts: Leading Cases in TennesseeTort Law contains summaries of leading cases on over 500 topics and citations to more than 1500 additional cases.
When a litigant has filed a motion to dismiss pursuant to the Tennessee Public Participation Act (TPPA), that motion should be analyzed under the provisions of the TPPA rather than under the traditional Tennessee Rule of Civil Procedure 12 analysis. In Reiss v. Rock Creek Construction, Inc. ,
Where plaintiff’s claims against defendant county were based on intentional torts, a one-year statute of limitations applied. Lauderdale County, Tennessee , No. In Anderson v. W2022-00332-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. 21, 2023), plaintiff was pulled over by a sheriff’s deputy employed by defendant county. Code Ann. § 8-8-302 and -303.
Where plaintiff brought a tort action against defendant based on defective products made pursuant to a contract between the parties, dismissal based on the economic loss doctrine was affirmed. In Vidafuel, Inc. Kerry, Inc. , M2024-00041-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. 4, 2024), the plaintiff developed and distributed wellness protein drinks.
Note: Chapter 25, Section 10 of Day on Torts: Leading Cases in TennesseeTort Law has been updated to include this decision. Day on Torts: Leading Cases in TennesseeTort Law contains summaries of leading cases on over 500 topics and citations to more than 1500 additional cases.
The Tennessee Supreme Court reviews very few cases in a given year. There are other types of cases that the Court is required to hear.) Given the case selection criteria in discretionary review matters and the types of appeal-as-of-right cases, each opinion is highly likely to materially impact Tennessee law.
Where plaintiff real estate professional brought an action for defamation and false light based on an online review written by defendant, defendant moved to dismiss the action pursuant to the Tennessee Public Participation Act (TPPA). In Charles v. McQueen , No. M2021-00878-COA-R3-CV, 2022 WL 4490980 (Tenn. citing Tenn. Code Ann. §
First, the Claims Commissioner ruled that the claim was “barred by § 70-7-102(a) of Tennessee’s Recreational Use Statute, which protects landowners, including the State of Tennessee, from responsibility for injury to recreational visitors.” In Victory v. State , No. M2020-01610-COA-R3-CV (Tenn.
Discussion has re-emerged in Tennessee regarding the economic loss rule, a judicially-created remedy that precludes contracting parties from pursuing tort remedies for purely economic.
Where the gravamen of plaintiff’s complaint was his tort claim for defamation seeking unliquidated damages, the chancery court did not have subject matter jurisdiction and the case should have been transferred to circuit court. In Lowery v. Redmond , No. W2021-00611-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. internal citation omitted).
The Tennessee Supreme Court decided the “Home Rule” case yesterday, with three of five justices finding that the Tennessee Education Savings Account Pilot Program was not unconstitutional. Seven of the civil cases involve tort issues, and civil procedure issues are present in two other cases.
Where plaintiff wife failed to give written notice of her loss of consortium claim against the State of Tennessee to the Division of Claims and Risk Management, dismissal of her claim was affirmed, despite the fact that her complaint was filed with the Claims Commission within the statute of limitations. In Kampmeyer v. State , No.
Where defendant physician was employed by a state university and received no personal gain from the clinical services she rendered at a hospital, and plaintiff had brought an HCLA action based on these hospital clinical services, summary judgment pursuant to defendant’s absolute immunity under the Tennessee Claims Commission Act was affirmed.
Although plaintiff labeled his complaint as a tort claim, the gravamen of the complaint was a dispute over “the amount, time and manner of payment of plaintiff’s pension plan benefits.” Defendant filed a motion to dismiss based on a lack of subject matter jurisdiction under Tennessee Rule of Civil Procedure 12.02(1).
Get access to the leading Tennessee books on the law of torts and the law of civil trial at a savings of 50%. BirdDog Law, the creation of John Day, is the go-to resource for Tennessee judges, lawyers and paralegals. This Black Friday sale gives you the opportunity to access John’s books at 50% off the normal price.
Get access to the leading Tennessee books on the law of torts and the law of civil trial at a savings of 50%. BirdDog Law, the creation of John Day, is the go-to resource for Tennessee judges, lawyers and paralegals. This Black Friday sale gives you the opportunity to access John’s books at 50% off the normal price.
Get access to the leading Tennessee books on the law of torts and the law of civil trial at a savings of 50%. BirdDog Law, the creation of John Day, is the go-to resource for Tennessee judges, lawyers and paralegals. This Black Friday sale gives you the opportunity to access John’s books at 50% off the normal price.
Readers know that we have launched BirdDog Law , a website for Tennessee lawyers and paralegals that (a) hosts three of my books and makes them available by subscription on a monthly or annual basis; and (b) provides a large number of free resources to help lawyers more efficiently serve their clients.
BirdDog Law is a website that provide access to legal information that Tennessee lawyers and paralegals need to better serve their clients. It is filled with free resources that will save you time and money. Interested in knowing the fax number for the Circuit Court Clerk in Henry County?
The Court pointed out that there is no Tennessee caselaw supporting the argument that “a lease or bailment was sufficient to meet the final element of conversion…,” but that caselaw instead “confirms that, in the typical case, the true owner of a property subject to a bailment is the bailor, not the bailee.” internal citation omitted).
Note: Chapter 64, Section 5 of Day on Torts: Leading Cases in TennesseeTort Law has been updated to include this decision. Day on Torts: Leading Cases in TennesseeTort Law contains summaries of leading cases on over 500 topics and citations to more than 1500 additional cases.
To be liable for civil trespass in Tennessee, the alleged tortfeasor does not have to intend to enter the property of another; he or she can commit trespass while believing the property is his or her own and only needs to intentionally be on the land. In Barrios v. Simpkins , No. M2021-01347-COA-R3-CV, 2022 WL 16846642 (Tenn.
In an amended complaint, plaintiff asserted that the statute of repose found in the Tennessee Products Liability Act (TPLA) would not bar her action because “the injuries suffered by [plaintiff] often take considerably longer than ten years to manifest themselves, in a fashion similar to injuries from exposure to asbestos.”
Tennessee Bar Journal , a publication of the Tennessee Bar Association, has published my latest Day on Torts column. The article discusses a recent opinion of the Tennessee Court of Appeals discussing the proximity element of negligent infliction of emotional claims.
Note: Chapter 28, Section 11 of Day on Torts: Leading Cases in TennesseeTort Law has been updated to include this decision. Day on Torts: Leading Cases in TennesseeTort Law contains summaries of leading cases on over 500 topics and citations to more than 1500 additional cases.
Note: Chapter 41, Section 8 of Day on Torts: Leading Cases in TennesseeTort Law has been updated to include this decision. Day on Torts: Leading Cases in TennesseeTort Law contains summaries of leading cases on over 500 topics and citations to more than 1500 additional cases.
Note: Chapter 82, Section 1 of Day on Torts: Leading Cases in TennesseeTort Law has been updated to include this decision. Day on Torts: Leading Cases in TennesseeTort Law contains summaries of leading cases on over 500 topics and citations to more than 1500 additional cases.
Where defendant driver stated that the accident that injured plaintiff passenger was due to her swerving to avoid a wild animal that unexpectedly entered the roadway, and plaintiff “presented no evidence of negligence on the part of the defendant,” summary judgment for defendant was affirmed by the Tennessee Court of Appeals. In Owings v.
Plaintiff attempted to use evidence of “Goodall’s discussions concerning the cap” to invoke this exception, but the Court found that such evidence was inadmissible under Tennessee Rule of Civil Procedure 407, and that plaintiff thus failed to present sufficient evidence that such a duty was undertaken by Goodall.
The tort claims in this case were subject to the three-year statute of limitations applicable to injuries to real property, and the Court of Appeals agreed that this limitations period would not be tolled by the discovery rule under the facts here. Click on the link to see the book’s Table of Contents.
Coffee County, Tennessee , No. Note: Chapter 41, Section 7 of Day on Torts: Leading Cases in TennesseeTort Law has been updated to include this decision. Day on Torts: Leading Cases in TennesseeTort Law contains summaries of leading cases on over 500 topics and citations to more than 1500 additional cases.
While there were no Tennessee cases directly on point, the Court of Appeals explained that this case “share[d] similarities with cases involving a landlord who leases property to a tenant who maintains a vicious dog on the property.” Day on Torts: Leading Cases in TennesseeTort Law ? Tennessee Law of Civil Trial ?
A premises liability plaintiff must prove the elements of the tort, but must also “first prove that a dangerous or defective condition existed on the owner’s property” and must show that the defendant either created the dangerous condition or had actual or constructive notice of the condition. Summary judgment for DSS was affirmed on appeal.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content