This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
As someone with a tremendous respect for the dedication of athletes to their craft, I always relish the opportunity to hear from those who have achieved measurable success in their sport of choice. The sport has opened many doors for me throughout my career and helped me build lifelong friendships, and I want that for others.
At last, the NCAA has changed its policy on college athletes monetizing their name, image, and likeness, also known as their NIL. What matters is that college athletes can finally market their valuable NIL and enrich themselves while the NCAA is enriching itself during their college careers. Therein lies the risk.
The world of Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) has exploded onto the scene and taken college athletics by storm. The impact of NIL on the college sports landscape is a topic of daily discussion throughout sports media.
In the story, Joyner maintained that there are differences between biological males and females in sports that give advantages to certain trans-athletes. Notably, that is the view of many athletic organizations. For example, track and field competitions recently adopted restrictions based on similar conclusions.
You can find and export testimony related to a single topic, even when that testimony is siloed in disparate minds and witnesses and attorneys and cases and time. Does your opposing counsel object slightly more often, across multiple depositions, when certain topics are discussed? Maybe those topics make them nervous.
From this platform, employees can access exclusive CPD-accredited e-learning courses on a range of health and safety topics and share these with your staff. Designed by athletes for athletes, strava is a mobile application and website that connects millions of runners and cyclists worldwide.
From trade secret theft and racial equity in venture capital to school curriculum disputes, algorithmic product liability, and transgender participation in sports, these cases are not merely high-profilethey are legally transformative. Athletic Fairness Justification: Male physiological traits (testosterone, anatomy, etc.)
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content