This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Robotaxis Robotaxis are exploding with more and more use in more and more cities.Autonomous taxis are collecting valuable data, improving with each deployment. Companies like Waymo are leading the charge, with AI enabling cross-city learning and adaptation. Use of these models have lots of applications for law.
Its rare for litigation teams to lose cases purely for lack of legal skill. The Importance of Efficient Trial Preparation Efficient trial preparation is crucial for a successful outcome in any legal case. It involves the meticulous collection and organization of all the raw materials an attorney will need for a hearing or court case.
Share The Relist Watch column examines cert petitions that the Supreme Court has relisted for its upcoming conference. Over the past couple of conferences, the Supreme Court has continued to clear out the rolls of relisted cases. His direct examination was interrupted at noon by a lengthy overnight recess. But Perry v.
Share Jason Smith claims that when an expert witness testified in Arizona’s drug possession case against him using drug analysis performed by a former state employee, it violated his constitutional rights. The Supreme Court will hear oral argument on Wednesday in his case, Smith v.
But an examiner assigned to such an analysis is typically given “irrelevant contextual information” like the name, race and background of the lead suspect — information that could “predispose” the examiner to believe the bullet was fired from that suspect’s gun, producing a “result-driven opinion” about a suspect’s guilt.
These investigations mark the first cases following the compliance deadline set by the DMA in early March. In Google’s case, the European Commission is investigating whether the search results provided prioritize the company’s vertical search tools over competing services.
If the law firm accepted the case before the statute of limitations period expired, it could result in a finding of legal malpractice. As a personal injury paralegal, you need to know every type of statute of limitations period, the exceptions and memorize them for every one of your cases that have not been commenced yet (i.e.,
The Indian Supreme Court ordered Friday an inquiry over the tutoring of witnesses in a criminal case inside a police station. During cross-examination, however, it was revealed that these witnesses were coached by the police a day before their testimony was recorded in court.
This justification is powerful in so far as it demonstrates that territorially based jurisdiction (in civil and criminal cases) is one side of a two sided bargain: obedience and allegiance in exchange for protection. The findings highlight the challenges posed by this fragmentation and make a strong case for harmonisation.
In this case, Erich Sorenson was arrested without a warrant on the doorstep of his apartment. At the set meeting time and location, investigators identified Daniel Deuble playing basketball and observed him using his cell phone at the times in which the undercover officer sent messages pretending to be the girl. First, Sorenson v.
This week, we feature criminal defense lawyer John Tolley , who has tried more than 45 jury trials and handled thousands of cases. . JT Law is now a three-partner firm that handles insurance, civil litigation and immigration cases in Florida, New York and New Jersey. I depose and cross-examine several experts in engineering.
In 2010, I started my own business and was approached by a personal injury firm to help them reduce the bottleneck of cases and train their paralegals. Others have their paralegals work on a file from case intake all the way through trial. In most cases, the client has probably never had to hire a lawyer or file a case in court.
Are you a personal injury paralegal struggling to keep up with all of those active case files? Our Personal Injury Paralegal Boot Camp gives you all of the tools to manage your personal injury cases from case intake through the demand letter, and everything in between. Use a Grid and a Narrative. Bates Number or Bookmark.
The Relist Watch column examines cert petitions that the Supreme Court has relisted for its upcoming conference. But the court denied review of landlord Lebene Konans cross-petition claiming that Postal Service employees conspired to deny her civil rights. A short explanation of relists is available here.
New York affirmed the requirement for cross-examination of testimonial statements offered at trial and rejected a state law exception to the rule. A jury convicted Darrell Hemphill of second-degree murder after a trial court admitted un-cross-examined testimonial statements from a third-party’s plea allocution.
The convergences between legal collaboration among countries and technological innovations have revolutionized how cross-border legal issues are approached and resolved. Videoconferences and virtual hearings Videoconferencing and video-links are familiar today after the widespread use they acquired during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Lots of talk about how AI could be used by legal ops to do what they do better. The people I talked to were asking how they could best use AI today to improve legal ops value. There was lots of talk about the need for human skills in the legal ops matrix. This could be big opportunity for legal ops.
The two techniques are equally susceptible to producing wrongful convictions, when police use either “without precautions,” according to Beatty. Such foresight, Beety maintained, may produce a “more robust examination and consideration of [the] software and its usage,” because the flaws of both methods are intertwined.
The case concerned the digital depiction of five tattoos on professional wrestler and current WWE champion, Randy Orton, in the “ WWE 2K ” professional wresting video game series. This article examines the case, looking at: The Copyright Act of 1976, The Court’s decision on summary judgment, The conflicting judgment in the NBA 2K case.
With some exceptions, this minimal use of the ESCP fits the general trend across Europe ( Deloitte Report ). The use of the Regulation establishing the European Payment Order (“EPO Regulation”) experienced a similar fluctuation between 2018 and 2020. Two of these preliminary references led to the judgment Joined Cases C?453/18
Share The Supreme Court on Friday sent the case of an Arizona man convicted of drug possession back to the state courts. But the justices sent the case back to the state courts for them to determine whether the absent analyst’s statements qualified as “testimony” – another criteria for the confrontation clause to apply.
Kim now works as a solution consultant for Opus 2 , a legal technology company that offers a streamlined case management solution for everything from document management to hearings, arbitrations, and trials. You can fast-track your career with our 3-Step Roadmap to Manage Cases Like a Rockstar Litigation Paralegal!
Lane Haygood , of Haygood Law in Odessa, Texas, offered a series of tweets on conducting cross-examination. Cross-examination is an essential skill for a trial lawyer, and one most lawyers are truly, mind-bogglingly terrible about, because they overcomplicate the process. Most lawyers try to script their crosses.
The ICO conducted a joint investigation with the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner (OAIC) to determine how Clearview AI has been using images data scraped from the internet and biometrics for facial recognition. The case made out by the company will be examined thoroughly before the ICO declares its final decision.
He authors a series linking law school canonical cases with intellectual property counterparts. As taught this year, Civil Procedure II took us through personal jurisdiction, subject matter jurisdiction, and finished off with the Erie doctrine. Luckily, that wasn’t the case! As of May 24, 2021, 63 cases have cited Ford.
Bickett’s appeal centered on the lower court not giving enough weight to the defense’s video evidence (an annotated version of which was tweeted by Bickett) nor to a responding, on-duty police officer’s conflicting testimony regarding the illegal use of a police baton.
A new petition asks the court to examine the phrase again and help define when a document crosses the publication threshold. A new petition asks the court to examine the phrase again and help define when a document crosses the publication threshold. Centripetal Networks, Inc. Cisco Systems, Inc. , 869, 877 (Fed.
The Patent Act of 1836 included a unique disclosure requirement for defendants raising a defense that patent was invalid because the invention was already publicly known or used. Thus, the defendant is required to automatically identify the names and residence of the people with prior knowledge as well as the location where the item was used.
Ugur Tatlici , Case No. Meanwhile, enforcement efforts are ongoing in Turkey, where the case is before the Istanbul 13th Civil Court of First Instance presided over by Judge Hakan Kabalci. In this respect, the case underlines a growing transatlantic divergence. In both Tatlici and the New Zealand case Kea Investments Ltd v.
This article takes as its focus international civil litigation – the judicial resolution of cross-border disputes – as a particular example of a globalised market in which sustainability considerations are presently neglected, and examines how this omission ought to be addressed.
Facts of the Case Arizona law enforcement officers found petitioner Jason Smith with a large quantity of what appeared to be drugs and drug-related items. On appeal, he argued that the State’s use of a substitute expert to convey the substance of Rast’s materials violated his Confrontation Clause rights. Washington , 541 U.S.
Jason Smith alleges that the expert’s testimony contravened the Sixth Amendment’s confrontation clause, which gives defendants in criminal cases the right to “be confronted with the witnesses against him,” and a majority of the justices seemed inclined to agree with him. In this case, Samuels said, Longoni was not a “conduit” for Rast’s work.
It contains the following articles: Chukwuma Samuel Adesina Okoli & Abubakri Yekini, “Implied jurisdiction agreements in international commercial contracts: a global comparative perspective” This article examines the principles of implied jurisdiction agreements and their validity on a global scale.
The strategic use of analytics can revolutionize resource allocation in law firms, paving the way for enhanced efficiency and profitability. Identifying Key Metrics for Resource Allocation The first step in using analytics for resource allocation is to identify the key metrics that align with your firm’s business objectives.
Strong, clear, and persuasive writing can make a difference in the outcome of a case, influencing courts, clients, and opposing counsel. At its core, legal writing supports the practice of law, ensuring that legal professionals can advocate for clients, interpret laws, and present cases in a structured manner.
As noted in the letter from Professor Chao that Dennis posted earlier, key filings in this case are not publicly accessible (nor are the transcripts). billion in damages for Intel’s pre-trial use of the patents. A regression is a statistical analysis that is used to estimate the impact of several variables on another variable.
Bolen, she rejected spousal immunity in a criminal case where she believed the couple got hitched for evidentiary rather thanromantic reasons. ” In reality, there are exceptions as in cases where the two spouses are adverse parties. In this case, the timing was a bit too perfect for the court’s taste.
In this article we examine the trends and their relationship with legal technology, with practical advice you can use to best leverage legal tech in the dynamic in-house environment.
As cases grow more complex and timelines tighten, legal teams face mounting pressure to streamline their trial preparation processes without compromising thoroughness or quality. Additionally, ever-evolving case strategies can disrupt even the most meticulously planned preparations. The advantages of such a system are immense.
Tangibly uses three personas — employees, contractors and partners — to define the contractual relationships that may protect the asset. Future plans for the product call for greater automation and risk assessment, using AI-enabled tools for rapid portfolio assembly and risk management. Who has access to the trade secret? ”
I do this frequently for its efficiency and help in forming my case as we advance. A primary reason to preadmit evidence is for use in opening statements. The military judge put his imprimatur on the evidence before the defense had the opportunity to cross-examine the witness in front of the fact-finder.
Superior Court , the Supreme Court today holds a statutory hearsay-rule exception that makes admissible some “former testimony” normally doesn’t allow a deposition from an earlier lawsuit to be used against a party who was also a party in the prior action. ” Observing that “[a] discovery deposition.
This blog will guide you through: The standard legal memo format and how to use it. Purpose and Audience Primarily, drafters write legal memos for internal use, directed at colleagues, supervisors, or clients within a law firm or legal department. The essential components of a legal memo that make it effective.
by Dennis Crouch The pending case of Jump Rope Systems v. The case also (3) raises a straight-up due process challenge to the IPR system. And, a conclusion of invalidity under a lower standard does not conclusively tell us that the same claim would have been proven invalid under a higher standard. See, for instance, Moffitt v.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content